What Do Russian Sanctions Imply? 24 February 2022
In terms of the possible effects of the crisis between Russia and Ukraine on commercial life, the statements made by the countries in the international community regarding this crisis are crucial. In this sense, Germany froze the approval process of the Nord Stream 2 gas line as a first step, while the USA banned trade with Luhansk and Donetsk. On the other hand, England froze the assets of five Russian banks and three Russian billionaires in the country, and Japan gave some sanction signals for the future. Finally, Canada announced that in the first phase of economic sanctions, Canadians were barred from financial agreements with Donetsk and Luhansk.
First of all, it would be reasonable to examine the sanctions in two stages. The first title of the sanctions is the relation to trade with the so-called "autonomous" pro-Russian entities established in the Luhansk and Donetsk Regions. The United States has prohibited all its citizens from trading any products or raw materials with these territories. In the second stage, US Administration orders for the termination of commercial relations with the institutions and organizations determined by the Executive Order.
|
||||
|
The difference of this approach from the embargoes applied to Iran is in terms of the people on whom the sanctions will be applied. Because, in the embargo applied to Iran, serious obstacles were placed on the trade of third parties who are not US citizens in matters that were within the scope of the embargo. Naturally, the application of these restrictions to third parties was not the same as the application to their own citizens. The application of this prohibition to third parties by the US was naturally not the same as its application to its own citizens. Sanctions differed between those involving their own nationals (Primary sanctions) and those involving foreign nationals (Secondary sanctions). The issue with whom (real and legal) trade is prohibited within the framework of these sanctions is determined through the SDN (Specially Designated Citizens) list published by the Ministry of the Treasury. Although it is not as comprehensive as the Iran example, this list, which includes 445 real and legal persons, is a list that should be checked before trading with Russia. |
||||
|
Primary Sanctions: Binds US natural and legal persons (including green card holders) US-owned foreign companies that the US citizens hold majority stakes in for the purpose of investing. Violation of these sanctions can result in punishments up to imprisonment. |
||||
|
Secondary Sanctions: It binds citizens of other countries, including Turkish natural and legal persons. It can be applied to natural and legal person’s actions that the USA determines to violate the sanctions. If the use of dollars in the SWIFT system is made by the company using US systems (even the domain and hosting of the website), it is subject to primary sanctions. This means that your money transfers through the USA may be seized due to sanctions violation, or the US financial institution will refuse to make the transaction or return the money to the sender. |
||||
|
As a result, unlike the embargo applied to Iran, sanctions to be applied to Russia does not envisage an embargo covering foreign nationals. |
||||
|
In summary, with the Executive Order issued in the USA, financial institutions that play an important role in the Russian defense industry and the development of the country's infrastructure that have strong organic ties with the state were targeted. Vnesheconombank (VEB), a state bank that has an immense share in the development of Russia's economic and industrial infrastructure, its managers and subsidiaries were included in the banned lists by OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control). In this context, the assets of the relevant organizations and individuals in the USA were confiscated. |
||||
|
In addition, Promsvyazbank (PSB), which is a state bank that has a large share in the financing of the Russian defense industry, its subsidiaries and high level officials are also within the scope of the ban. In this context, US citizens and US-related legal entities will completely terminate their communication with these organizations and the United States Administration will prohibit the entry of natural persons that are within the scope of the ban. |
||||
|
IN CONCLUSION, the crisis between Russia and Ukraine has not yet had an enforceable effect on the third country citizens in terms of trade. The reason for this is that the USA and other European countries did not envisage an embargo that could potentially spread to all citizens of the world, both administratively and legally. Since these sanctions are only targeting certain financial institutions and their managers, they practically do not affect individuals exporting to Russia. If the third parties does not establish commercial relationships with the designated area and institutions set forth in the Executive Order, there won’t be any liability issues for commercial activities. However, if Russia continues its aggressive stance, it is clear that a potential series of sanctions awaits Russia. Although Russia’s removal from the SWIFT system, which was a measure applied to Iran in 2012, will affect countries such as the USA and Germany, it is a possibility that should be taken into account if Russia's progress continues. In this case, as in the case of Iran, additional sanctions will adversely affect both Russia and real and legal persons who have commercial relations with Russia. |
Other News
-
2.6.2026
Designation of Critical Infrastructure Sectors Under Cybersecurity Law No. 7545 and Key Compliance Obligations
Cybersecurity Law No. 7545, which introduces comprehensive and far-reaching rules governing cybersecurity in Türkiye, was enacted on 12 March 2025. The Law regulates the powers of the Cybersecurity Authority, the rules to be observed by public institutions and private companies, supervisory mechanisms, and applicable sanctions.
-
25.5.2026
Does Your 2025 Balance Sheet Trigger a VERBIS Obligation? Deadline Set for 5 June 2026
The Personal Data Protection Authority ("Authority") has published an important announcement regarding corporate taxpayer legal entity data controllers that have become subject to the obligation to register with the Data Controllers' Registry ("VERBIS") due to the criteria relating to the 2025 financial balance sheet total. Within the scope of the announcement, the period granted for the fulfillment of the VERBIS registration and notification obligation has been extended until Friday, 5 June 2026.
-
22.5.2026
The Competiton Authority Has Updated Its Merger And Acquisition Guidelines: What Has Changed For Trancastion Parties?
There have been significant developments in the field of mergers and acquisitions in recent times. The Competition Authority has implemented a comprehensive update process with the aim of making the regulatory framework in this area clearer and more predictable. This process, which began with the amendments to the Communiqué No. 2026/2 on the Amendment to the Communiqué on Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Approval of the Competition Board (Communiqué No. 2010/4) in February 2026, has entered a new phase with the updated guidelines published in May 2026.
-
20.5.2026
A New Approach to the Limits of the Institution of Amendment of Pleadings: Unification of Judgments Decision
1. INTRODUCTION By its decision dated 08.05.2026, the Grand General Assembly for the Unification of Judgments of the Court of Cassation explicitly ruled that a claim not initially included in the statement of claim cannot subsequently be introduced into the action by way of "partial amendment".
-
13.5.2026
Significant Amendments to Temporary Incapacity Periods for Maternity under the Social Security Institution
Extension of Maternity Leave Periods under Circular No. 2026/13: With the Circular dated 08.05.2026 and numbered 2026/13 issued by the Social Security Institution (“SSI”), the implementation of temporary incapacity benefits under maternity insurance within the scope of the Social Insurance and General Health Insurance Law No. 5510 has been updated. The aforementioned amendments have been introduced in line with Law No. 7578, which entered into force on 01.05.2026. These regulations include new provisions that are particularly significant for employers and employees, especially with respect to the extension of postnatal rest periods and the transitional rules applicable to existing medical reports.
-
11.5.2026
The Communique Regarding Proffesions Subject to the Requirement for a Professional Competency Cerificate (2026/1) Has Been Published
With the "Communiqué Regarding Occupations Subject to the Mandatory Professional Competency Certificate by the Professional Competency Authority," dated March 23, 2026, and published in the Official Gazette No. 33202, the requirement to hold a Professional Competency Certificate has been expanded to include certain occupations classified as hazardous or highly hazardous
-
4.5.2026
Significant Changes in the Workplace: Maternity Leave Periods Revised
Law No. 7578, amending the Social Services Act and certain other laws, entered into force following its publication in Official Gazette No. 33240 dated 1 May 2026. This regulation introduces significant changes, particularly regarding maternity leave durations, which have implications for employers in terms of workforce planning and organisational processes. In this bulletin, we examine the key changes introduced by the regulation.
-
30.4.2026
Draft Law On The Protection Of Trade Secrets Has Been Released!
Whilst Turkish law contains various provisions on trade secrets across different laws and subordinate regulations, there has been no standalone legislation to date that directly and comprehensively defines trade secrets or provides for distinct protection and safeguard mechanisms. Prepared to address this gap, the Draft has been drafted in line with the EU's Directive 2016/943/EU on trade secrets and serves as a tool to support Turkey's international trade policies and the development of digital trade.
-
24.4.2026
A New Era For The Meal Allowance Exemption From Insurance Premium
Article 10 of Law No. 7577 on Amendments to Certain Laws, published in the Official Gazette dated 17.04.2026, introduced a significant amendment to paragraph (b) of Article 80, titled "Earnings Subject to Premium," of Law No. 5510 on Social Insurance and General Health Insurance, which regulates exemption amounts, with respect to the meal allowance exemption provided by employers.
-
20.4.2026
"Effective Remorse" as a Personal Ground Mitigating or Eliminating Punishment
1. What is Effective Remorse? Effective remorse is the legal consequence - in the form of a reduction or elimination of punishment - that the law attaches to the compensatory conduct voluntarily undertaken by a perpetrator following the completion of an offence, as a result of the remorse experienced by that perpetrator.
-
9.4.2026
Deadline for Compliance with Minimum Capital Requirement: 31 December 2026
Articles 332 and 580 of the Turkish Commercial Code (the "TCC") regulate the minimum capital requirements for joint stock companies and limited liability companies, respectively, and stipulate that such amounts shall be determined and may be increased by a Presidential Decree. Pursuant to this authority, with Presidential Decree No. 7887 published in the Official Gazette dated 25 November 2023, the minimum capital amounts have been significantly increased. Accordingly, under the said Decree:
-
7.4.2026
The Occupational Health And Safety Training Regulation Has Been Amended! What Innovations Does The 2026 Regulation Introduce?
Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) trainings constitute the cornerstone of a proactive approach to preventing workplace accidents. The new "Regulation on the Procedures and Principles of Occupational Health and Safety Training for Employees", which entered into force on April 2, 2026, repealed the 2013 regulation and introduced fundamental changes centered on digitalization, accessibility, and measurability in training processes.
-
2.4.2026
The Rights of Minority Shareholders: How Powerful Are They in Reality?
The fundamental principle in joint-stock companies and commercial companies in general is the majority rule. Shareholders holding control determine the fate of the company. However, to prevent this from turning into absolute dominance, the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (the "TCC") grants minority shareholders various rights. The purpose of these rights is to establish a balance between the majority and the minority, and to prevent the minority from becoming entirely ineffective against the company's management.
-
31.3.2026
Employment Retention Incentive in the Manufacturing Industury Enters into Face
The Regulation on the Implementation of the Employment Retention Support Program was published in the Official Gazette dated 3 March 2026 and numbered 33185, and has entered into force.The Program aims to preserve and increase employment in enterprises operating in the manufacturing industry. It covers the period between 1 January 2026 and 31 December 2026, with the final deadline for submitting payment claims set as 31 March 2027.
-
30.3.2026
A Roadmap for the Seizure of Shares in Capital Companies: Differences Between Joint-Stock and Limited Liability Companies
I. Introduction A share in a capital company constitutes a complex legal value encompassing partnership status, financial rights, and managerial powers. Pursuant to the provisions of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") and the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004 ("EBL"), the shares held by a debtor partner in a capital company may be seized by that partner's personal creditors. However, structural differences between joint-stock companies and limited liability companies, together with factors such as whether the shares are embodied in negotiable instruments and the function of commercial registry records, give rise to significant procedural distinctions at the seizure stage. This article examines - without entering into the sale phase - solely the procedure, legal nature, and principal practical differences in the seizure of shares in joint-stock and limited liability companies, in the light of the established case law of the Court of Cassation.