Responsibility Of Intermediary Service Provider For Defective Products Purchased Electronically. 07 February 2022
ON 15.11.2021, REGARDING THE LIABILITY OF THE SERVICE PROVIDER, 3rd LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF HIGH COURT DECIDED THAT THE INTERMEDIATE SERVICE PROVIDER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEFICIENCY OF THE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE PURCHASED ELECTRONICALLY.
1. According to Article 2 of the Law on the Regulation of Electronical Commerce, which came into force on 01.05.2015, with the headline "Definitions" states that; service provider means 'Real or legal persons engaged in electronic commerce activities', intermediary service provider means 'real and legal persons who provide the electronic commerce environment for the economic and commercial activities of others'. In the decision, which is based on the examination of the responsibility attributed to real and legal persons defined within the scope of this law, after the purchasing of the product from the intermediary service provider's website the package was sent to the buyer by a registered "patisserie" of the site. Following the delivery, it was discovered that a cigarette butt came out from the package and accordingly, the responsibility for the defective product was examined. |
Today, it is obvious that commercial and daily life is gradually shifting towards the virtual environment. At this point, classifying the responsibility attributed for the products purchased over internet has become a difficult issue to dissect. In line with the developments, the work of legislators and related institutions carries crucial importance. The relevant event, which is the subject of our bulletin, has become even more critical due to the direction of today's understanding of consumption. |
In the concrete case, the plaintiff, who objected to the decision of the Esenler Consumer Arbitration Committee, stated that they have only mediated through the website where the plaintiff offered services to real or legal persons conducting sales activities. The defendant's application for a refund due to the defective product was accepted by the Consumer Arbitration Committee with the decision dated 20.03.2019 and numbered 056120190000723. The request of the intermediary institution, which objected to the decision regarding the refund, was rejected by the court of first degree. The reason for the refusal arises from the fact that the buyer receives service by relying on the name of the intermediary service provider. In the decision, the court further stated the basis for the refusal as the internal relationship between the plaintiff and the company providing the supply, thus, the issue of recourse is also not applicable since this relationship is subject to the internal affairs of the intermediary and the supplier. |
Following this, in the letter of the Ministry of Justice dated 17/03/2021; Although it is not possible to deal with the liability of the plaintiff company, which is not a seller, importer or manufacturer, but is a service provider to the consumer, in accordance with Articles 8 and the following, with the title of "Defective Goods" in the First Chapter of the Third Part of the Law on the Protection of the Consumer, It has been argued that the dismissal of the lawsuit on the grounds that the company is responsible for the services rendered due to commission received from the supplier company is contrary to the procedure and the law. |
All of the above-mentioned materials were evaluated by the High Court. The Court analyzed the issue that caused the dispute as the liability regarding the defect in the products purchased electronically and started its examinations accordingly. |
Evaluating the issue, the High Court first made analyzes within the framework of Article 13 of the Law on the Protection of the Consumer. According to the first paragraph of the relevant article, “Defective service is a service that is contrary to the contract because it does not start within the time specified in the contract or does not have the features that are agreed by the parties that it should have objectively.” Again, in accordance with Article 11 of the same Law, the responsibility of the seller, the manufacturer and the importer for the defective goods and the responsibility of the consumer for the optional rights are stated in this article. |
According to Article 2 of the Law on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce, which entered into force on 01.05.2015, in the title "Definitions", service provider means; 'Real or legal persons engaged in electronic commerce'. The intermediary service provider, which is defined in the continuation of the article, refers to the real and legal persons who provide the electronic commerce environment for the economic and commercial activities of others. |
Responsibility of Intermediary Service Providers, defined in Article 9 of the same law, is also stated in paragraph 4 of Article 6 of the same law as; “(4) The intermediary service provider is not obliged to check the content provided by real and legal persons using the electronic environment it provides services through, or to investigate whether there is an unlawful activity or situation related to this content and the goods or services subject to the content.” |
With this approach of the High Court, the responsibility automatically attributed to institutions that only act as intermediaries, and the obligation of recourse that arises accordingly, has been eliminated and a more direct causal link has been established between the parties. Thus, the 6th and 9th articles of the Law on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce were evaluated together and considering that the plaintiff, who is the intermediary service provider, is not responsible for the defective goods, a verdict has to be given for the acceptance of the case. The appeal request of the Ministry of Justice advocating regarding this aspect of the law has been accepted. |
As a result, with the decision taken, the approach of the Consumer Arbitration Committee, which holds the intermediary institutions directly responsible, was found to be faulty and the foundations for a more balanced regime between the Consumer and the Intermediary Institution were laid. Thanks to this approach of the Court of Cassation, institutions and organizations that carry out intermediary activities by receiving commissions on their own website are evaluated according to strict liability before the Arbitration Committees, and with this decision, the responsibility of the intermediary has been reduced and the responsibility relationship between the parties has been classified more clearly. |
Other News
-
19.4.2024
The Constitutional Court Decision Annulled The Regulation Envisaging Liability For Litigation Expenses Within The Scope Of Mediation In Civil Disputes
In accordance with paragraph 11 of Article 18/A of Law No. 6325 on Mediation in Civil Disputes1 ("the Code"), a party shall be held liable for the entire cost of the litigation, nothwithstanding justification at the conclusion of the proceedings, and shall not be granted power of attorney fee if he or she fails to appear for the initial session of mandatory mediation without providing an explanation.The aforementioned regulation is outlined as follows:
-
8.4.2024
E-Application" Period In Capital Markets Board Applications
With its announcement dated 5 February 2024, the Capital Markets Board ("Board") announced to the public that capital market institutions, organisations and partnerships will be able to make their applications more quickly and effectively through the e-Application System.
-
5.4.2024
The Amounts In The Pre-Conditions To Be Complied With Before The Initial Public Offering Of Shares In Several Sectors Were Decreased
The Capital Markets Board ("Board" or "CMB") decreased the financial thresholds for financial statements, especially considering the sectoral differences of the companies that submitting to the Board for initial public offering and the 12th Development Plan ("Plan") prepared by the Presidency of the Strategy and Budget Directorate.
-
15.3.2024
New Regulations Introduced With The 8th Judicial Package
The Law No. 7499 on the Amendment of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Certain Laws ("Law"), which contains amendments and new regulations known as the "8th Judicial Package", was published in the Official Gazette dated 12 March 2024 and numbered 32487. In this article, we will discuss the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271 (" CPC"), Turkish Criminal Code No. 5237 ("TCC"), Turkish Civil Code No. 4721 ("TCC"), Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004 ("EBC") and Law No. 6384 on the Duties and Working Procedures and Principles of the Compensation Commission.
-
12.3.2024
Changes In The PDPL Was Published In THE Official Gazette
Law No. 7499 on Amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure and Some Laws ("Law No. 7499") including critical amendments to the Law No. 6698 on the Personal Data Protection Law ("PDPL") was published in the Official Gazette on March 12, 2024.
-
9.2.2024
Amendments Were Made To The Regulations Based On The Occupational Health And Safety Law
In the Official Gazette dated 4 February 2024 and numbered 32450, amendments were made to some regulations issued based on the Occupational Health and Safety Law No. 6331:
-
1.2.2024
Turkish Competition Board Mergers And Acquisitions Outlook Report For 2023 Has Been Published
On January 5th, 2024, the Turkish Competition Authority has published the Report prepared by the Competition Board on Mergers, Acquisitions And Privatisation Transactions in 2023 ("Report").
-
31.1.2024
Important Principle Decision From The Advertising Board Regarding Discount Sale Advertisements
At the first meeting of the year held on January 9, 2024, the Advertising Board made an important principle decision regarding discount sale advertisements by amending the "Guideline on Advertisements Containing Price Information and Discount Sale Advertisements and Commercial Practices" in order to prevent consumer victimization through misleading advertisements and practices that lead to unfair competition in the retail trade sector.
-
17.1.2024
The Authority to Decide on Trademark Cancellation Passed to the Turkish Patent And Trademark Office!
In Article 192/1 (a) of the Industrial Property Law ("IPL") published in the Official Gazette dated 10 January 2017 and numbered 29944, the enforcement of Article 26 of the Law titled "Cancellation Cases and Cancellation Request" was postponed until seven years later, and with the Provisional Article 4 of the IPL, it was stipulated that the authority to decide on the cancellation of trademarks would be directly exercised by the Intellectual and Industrial Rights Civil Courts until 10 January 2024.
-
16.1.2024
Egemenoğlu Hukuk Bürosu / Internship Application
We are pleased to announce the opening of internship applications at Egemenoğlu Hukuk Bürosu. Legal Internship Application Deadline: March 15 Summer Internship Application Deadline: March 29 Prospective candidates are requested to submit their CVs either through our website www.egemenoglu.av.tr or by sending them to info@egemenoglu.av.tr.
-
12.1.2024
Turkish Sustainability Reporting Standards (TSRS) And Scope Of Application Of TSRSs Were Puslished In The Official Gazette
In the Official Gazette dated 29.12.2023 and numbered 32414, the Public Oversight, Accounting and Auditing Standards Authority (POA) announced the Turkish Sustainability Reporting Standards and determined the principles to be followed in sustainability reports.
-
11.1.2024
Important Regulations Which Are Effective As Of 2024 And/ Or Has Been Made Subject To Time Extension
Laws No. 5746 and No. 6550 extended the regulation on higher depreciation (showing expenses related to depreciation) and calculation rates and periods for new machines acquired for use in R&D, innovation and design activities.
-
19.12.2023
The Principles and Rules to be Applied in Retail Trade have been reorganize
With the "Regulation Amending the Regulation on Principles and Rules to be Applied in Retail Trade" prepared by the Ministry of Commerce and published in the official gazette on 14.12.2023, significant changes were made in the principles and rules of retail trade.
-
18.11.2023
Warning From The Authority On Sending Verification Codes To Customers Via Sms During Shopping
The Personal Data Protection Authority ("Authority") published a Public Announcement ("Announcement") on the Processing of Personal Data by Sending a Verification Code via SMS to the Data Subjects during Shopping in Stores.
-
14.11.2023
Communiqué Amending the Communiqué on the Procedures and Principles Regarding the Application of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 has been published
In order to regulate the procedures and principles to be followed in cases of loss of capital or insolvency of joint stock companies, limited liability companies and limited partnership companies with capital divided into shares within the scope of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (Law), the Communiqué on the Procedures and Principles Regarding the Application of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (Communiqué) was first published in the Official Gazette dated 15/09/2018 and numbered 30536, and with the Provisional Article 1 of this Communiqué until 01/01/2023, Within the scope of Article 376 of the Law, it was stated that foreign exchange losses arising from foreign currency denominated liabilities that have not yet been fulfilled may not be taken into account in the calculations regarding capital loss or insolvency.