LEGAL RESULTS OF CONTRARIETY TO THE PROHIBITON OF TERMINATION 19 June 2020
What is the meaning of the amendment made with the Law numbered 7244, which has been added to the Labor Law No. 4857?
Amendment made with the Law numbered 7244, which has been added to the Labor Law No. 4857, prohibits termination of the contract for 3 months, starting from the effective date, 17.04.2020. According to the Provisional Article 10: “Regardless of whether this Law is covered or not, any employment or service contract cannot be terminated by the employer, except for the situations that do not comply with the rules of ethics and goodwill and similar reasons mentioned in paragraph (II) of the first paragraph of Article 25 and the relevant provisions of other laws, for three months from the date of entry into force of this article.”
In the same legal arrangement, it is stated that in violation of the provisions of this article, the employer or the representative of the employer who terminates the employment contract will have an administrative fine at the monthly gross minimum wage amount for the employee whose contract is terminated. It should be noted that although the ban is limited to three months, the President has the power to extend the period up to six months. The regulation introduced concerns all kinds of service contracts whether or not they are subject to the Labor Law. Accordingly, there is no hesitation that it covers employment contracts subject to the Turkish Code of Obligations, labor contracts subject to the Press Labor Law and the Maritime Labor Law. According to a minority opinion, considering the aim of the law to Reduce the Effects of the Outbreak on Economic and Social Life, the prohibition of termination cannot be mentioned for workers and employers who are not affected by this epidemic. However, the general opinion is that such a distinction cannot be made. Therefore, no distinction can be made in terms of how much the employee or employer is affected or not affected by the outbreak in terms of prohibition. Because such a distinction is not explicitly mentioned in the law. In our opinion, there is no hesitation that the prohibition of termination should be applied regardless of the criterion of the epidemic, given the emphasis on the protection of employment both in the letter of legal regulations and in the President's statements since the beginning of the process.
As a matter of fact, on the protection of employment, with the Law No. 7226 dated 26.03.2020 provisional article 23 is added to the Unemployment Insurance Law No. 4447. With this provisional article, the conditions for applications for short-time work allowance to be made due to the epidemic have been facilitated, and it has been accepted that termination will not be made in the period in which short work has been applied, except article 25 / II of the Labor Law. The exceptions stated in the Article 25/ II of the Labor Law are regulated as follows; a) If, when the contract was concluded, the employee misled the employer by falsely claiming to possess qualifications or to satisfy requirements which constitute an essential feature of the contract, or by giving false information or making false statements; b) If the employee is guilty of any speech or action constituting an offence against the honour or dignity of the employer or a member of his family, or levels groundless accusations against the employer in matters affecting the latter’s honour or dignity; c) If the employee sexually harasses another employee of the employer; d) If the employee assaults or threatens the employer, a member of his family or a fellow employee, arrives at the workplace as drunk or takes drugs or using these substances in the workplace e) If the employee commits a dishonest act against the employer, such as a breach of trust, theft or disclosure of the employer’s trade secrets.; f) If the employee commits an offence on the premises of the undertaking which is punishable with seven days’ or more imprisonment without probation; g) If, without the employer’s permission or a good reason, the employee is absent from work for two consecutive days, or twice in one month on the working day following a rest day or on three working days in any month h) If the employee refuses, after being warned, to perform his duties; ı) If either wilfully or through gross negligence the employee imperils safety or damages machinery, equipment or other articles or materials in his care, whether these are the employer’s property or not, and the damage cannot be offset by his thirty days’ pay.
For these reasons, although there is no obstacle to the termination of the employment contract, during the prohibition of termination; The terminations made under this article will be examined by the courts in case of possible disputes, whether the reason for termination in question has been used by the employers to circumvent the prohibition of termination, and whether the just cause is required or not. If it is certain that there is no justifiable reason for the termination as a result of the trial, there will be a violation of the prohibition of termination. In this case, it may result from administrative fines or cancellation of short-time working allowance for the workplaces. Another point that needs to be emphasized is to comply with period, 6 business days, in terms of termination to be made on the basis of 25 / II. Because, according to the Supreme Court, the failure to comply with the lapse time, 6 days, is a reason that eliminates the justification of the termination. This prohibition is related to the will of termination of the employer. It is considered that the situations such as termination of the business relationship with a validly established mutual rescission agreement, spontaneous termination at the end of the term of the fixed term employment contract which has been concluded in accordance with the conditions required by the law, the termination of the employment contract due to reasons such as the death of the employee or employer should not be counted within the scope of the ban, since it does not contain termination. Although our legal evaluation is in this way, there are reports that there are internal correspondences of the institution that the exit code (22) is counted by İŞKUR under the prohibition of termination.
The prohibition of termination of the employment contract covers all terminations except for article 25 / II, as stated above. There is no other exception for termination of the employment contract. However, according to the one view, these terminations made within the prohibited period of the employer due to 25 / I of the Labor Law, due to the health reasons or compelling reasons according to the Article25 / III, or due to the employee’s being taken into custody or due to his arrest, his absence from work exceeds the notice period within the scope of the Article 25 / IV should not be deemed legally invalid. According to this view, terminations due to these reasons will result in penal sanctions / cancellation of short-time working allowances. However, just because the termination was made during the prohibition of termination, it should not be seen as unfair and invalid and there should be no need to pay compensation. However, given that the aim of the legislator is to ensure the continuity of employment, it is likely that this opinion will not be respected by the Supreme Court.
Although there was an explicit administrative sanction in the law, no regulation was introduced on the legal consequences of the termination against the prohibition during the prohibition of termination.
So what will be the consequences of acting against the prohibition of termination?
Of course, this will have legal implications, since it cannot be thought of only as an administrative sanction. It should be noted that this prohibition is directed to the will of the employer to terminate. There is no such ban in terms of employees. At this point, however, it should be noted that: The employer has been granted the right to unilaterally leave the employee unpaid leave with the same legal arrangement. And it has been ruled that it would not be a justifiable reason for termination for unpaid leave for the employee.
In which matters can a conflict arise in terms of employees whose employment contracts are terminated during the prohibition of termination?
Although there are various evaluations and discussions on the subject, the first thing that comes to mind in terms of the employee covered by job security is the ability of the employee for reemployment lawsuit. As a result of this lawsuit, as we have stated above, even if there are contrary views, it can be decided that the termination is invalid due to the fact that the termination was made during the ban period. Also in the reemployment lawsuit; since there is a termination made during the prohibition period, it may arise from the upper limit appreciation of the non-employment compensation determined in the law at the amount of 4 to 8 gross wages. Again, it should be noted that, in terms of termination during the termination prohibition period, the wages between the date of termination and the date when the termination prohibition ends (the payment in the amount of short-time working allowance or cash wage support allowance according to the application in the workplace) may be one of the controversies. For an employee who is not covered by job security, it is considered that it is possible for him to claim 3 times the amount of compensation for bad faith damages within the scope of the claim that the right was abused due to the termination applied during the prohibition of termination.
As a result, although judgments and discussions continue, as there is no judicial decision about the legal consequences of the prohibition of termination, how the matter will be evaluated and which legal sanctions will be applied will be clarified by the judicial decisions made in the future.
Other News
-
5.9.2025
Competition in the Labor Market: HR Practices to Avoid
The Turkish Competition Authority ("Authority"), which is entrusted with ensuring the proper functioning of markets, identifying practices that restrict competition, and imposing sanctions against infringements, operates under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition ("Law") without distinction between input and output markets. Labor markets have recently emerged as one of the primary arenas in which entities compete in input markets and, with the influence of various additional dynamics, have become a market increasingly prioritized by the Authority. The Guidelines on Competition Violations in Labor Markets ("Guidelines"), adopted by the Authority on November 21, 2024, serve as an important reference for the prevention of competition infringements in labor markets. In this bulletin, in light of the Guidelines and decisions of the Competition Board ("Board") within the Authority, (i) the fundamental principles and information regarding the application of competition law to labor markets, and (ii) the main prohibited practices to be observed when competing in labor markets will be addressed.
-
29.8.2025
Does An Employee's Extended Period Of Sick Leave Grant The Employer The Right To Terminate The Emploment Contract?
In employer-employee relations, the direct impact of long-term medical reports on the status of the employment contract holds critical importance for both employees and employers. In particular, uninterrupted periods of sick leave lasting for a certain duration are regulated under Article 25/I(b) of the Labour Law as a specific provision that grants the employer the right to immediate termination for just cause and determines the rights to be granted to the employee. In this context, how the employer may exercise the right of termination for just cause following the employee's extended medical leave and the legal basis of this process should be examined in detail.
-
27.8.2025
Regulation On Direct Selling Was Published
The Regulation on Direct Selling ("Regulation"), issued by the Ministry of Trade ("Ministry") pursuant to Articles 47/A and 84 of the Consumer Protection Law No. 6502, was published in the Official Gazette dated 08.08.2025 and numbered 32980, thereby entering into force.
-
18.8.2025
SMS Verification Codes and the Personal Data Protection Board's Guideline Decision No. 2025/1072
The Personal Data Protection Board's Guideline Decision dated 10 June 2025 and numbered 2025/1072 introduces significant regulations regarding personal data processing activities conducted through SMS verification codes, which have become a widespread practice in commercial life. The decision requires significant adjustments to customer relationship management, particularly in the service and retail industries.
-
11.8.2025
Mergers And Acquisitions Of Companies Engaged In Renewable Energy Gereration
In recent years, notable developments in Turkey's electricity market have extended beyond investments aimed solely at increasing generation capacity. The sector has also come into focus through strategic investments and merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions involving companies operating in the field of renewable energy.
-
31.7.2025
Annual Leave, Severance Pay, and Notice Pay in Part - Time Employment Contracts
Part-Time Employment Contract Article 13 of the Labor Law No. 4857 defines a part-time employment contract as "a contract in which the employee's normal weekly working hours are significantly less than those of a full-time employee performing similar work."
-
30.7.2025
Legal Remedies And The Official Appeal Process For Property Tax Values
a. General Overview Following the enactment of Law No. 4751 in 2002, which amended the Tax Procedure Law, the Property Tax Law, and the Fees Law, the declaration-based system for determining the property tax base was abolished, and the tariff and assesment procedure implemented by administrative authorities was adopted.
-
25.7.2025
Labour Law No. 4857 Amended! Electronic Notification Opportunity Introduced With Rem
Article 109 of the Labour Law No. 4857 has been amended, together with its title and content, by the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of the Value of Turkish Currency and Certain Laws and the Decree Law No. 635 published in the Official Gazette dated 24 July 2025. With this important amendment, the procedures regarding the form of notifications to be made between employers and employees have been redefined.
-
16.7.2025
Terminatıon Right Of The Employer Due To Conviction And Detention And Legal Consequences
In labour law practice, which is a dynamic field based on the principle of protecting the balance between the employee and the employer, the employee's failure to fulfill their obligation to perform work-especially when this results from circumstances that restrict individual freedom, such as conviction or detention-has significant legal consequences regarding the termination of the employment contract.
-
14.7.2025
Radical Change In The Labor Law Dated 14.07.2025: Flexible Week Holiday Period Has Started In The Tourism Sector!
With the Law No. 7553 on the "Amendment of Certain Laws and Decree Law No. 375" published in the Official Gazette on July 14, 2025, important innovations have been introduced in the Labor Law and some other laws. In this context; as of 14.07.2025, with the provision added to the article Article 46 of the Labor Law which regulates the week holiday, flexible week holiday specific to the tourism sector have been introduced.
-
9.7.2025
Climate Law Enacted
The Climate Law No. 7552 ("Law"), which includes regulations on the procedures and principles related to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the fight against climate change, climate adaptation activities, planning and implementation tools, revenues, permits and inspections, and the legal and institutional framework surrounding these, was published in the Official Gazette dated July 9, 2025, No. 32951, and entered into force. This Law sets out general principles and objectives from a casuistic perspective, preferring to leave detailed and technical regulations to secondary legislation.
-
7.7.2025
Mediation Practices In The Land Registry
Pursuant to the amendments introduced by Law on Amendments to the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law and to Certain Other Laws which was published in the Official Gazette dated 05.04.2023, numbered 32154 to the Law on Mediation in Civil Disputes dated 7/6/2012 and numbered 6325 ("Law"), the scope of disputes that may be resolved through procedural- mandatory- and voluntary mediation has been expanded.
-
27.6.2025
Effects Of The Concordatum Period On Pledgees
Pursuant to Article 285 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law (EBL), a debtor who is unable to pay their debts on time or is at risk of default may request a concordatum. During the period granted to the debtor upon such request, no enforcement proceedings may be initiated, and ongoing proceedings are suspended, in accordance with Article 294/1 of the EBL.
-
18.6.2025
M&A Dynamics in Publicly Traded Companies: New Investment Strategies Through Borsa Istanbul
In recent years, IPOs in Turkey have reached record levels. In 2023 and 2024, a large number of companies started trading in Borsa Istanbul as a result of initial public offerings (IPO) transactions. These IPOs, which attracted great interest from small investors, stand out as important strategic moves in which companies gain transparency and visibility, and also play a role as an important financing tool. With IPOs, publicly traded companies / partnerships are now drawing the attention of not only small investors but also domestic/foreign strategic and financial investors.
-
16.6.2025
The Court Of Cassation Abandoned Its Long-Standing Precedent Regarding Construction Conracts In Return For Land Shares, Known As "Advance Deed"
Construction contracts in return for land shares are a common practice in the construction sector in Turkey.