Should The Defense Of The Employee Be Taken for The Reporting Period Of Him/Her Due To The Health Reason? 20 May 2019
As is known, in accordance with the provision 25/1-b of Labour Law No. 4857, the employer's right to terminate the contract of employee arises after the reporting period, due to the health reasons, exceeds notice period six weeks. As a result of the termination in this way, the employer's obligation to pay severance payment arose, however, when the issue is examined in terms of job security provisions; it was long debated whether the obtaining defense was necessary or not before the termination and different decisions of the different departments of the Supreme Court of Appeals has caused uncertainty in the application
. As follows;
In accordance with the regulation of Article 19 of Law No. 4857;
“An indefinite-term employment contract of a worker cannot be terminated for reasons related to that worker's behavior or performance without receiving his/her defense relating the claims against him/her. However, the employer’s right of termination in accordance with the conditions of the clause (II) of article 25 is reserved.”
it is foreseen that the defense of the employee should be taken before the termination due to reasons related to the behavior or performance of the employee.
In the decisions of some departments of the Supreme Court of Appeals, it is stated that it is a legal requirement to take a defense in the terminations other than this article only with reference to acceptance that the termination based on Article 25/II of the Labor Law is an exception, in the context of the provision of Article 19 concerning the obligation to take a defense. In other words, it is stated that there is a necessity to take a defense in the termination which is regulated in Article 25/ I-b of the Labor Law, based on the fact that the health report period exceeding 6 weeks the notice period of the worker. In the decisions of the Court of Appeals for the 9th circuit, in particular after 2015, it is emphasized that there is a need for defense and stated as “the employee’s defense must be taken in accordance with Article 19 as it is related to the efficiency of the worker's not fulfilling the performance of work due to health reasons.”
Taking into consideration that the decisions of the Civil department No. 22 of the Supreme Court are in the opposite way, and that in the last paragraph of Article 25, the employee can apply to the judicial remedy based on the provisions of the job security; and except the termination regarding 25 / II, it is seen that there is no obligation to take any defense.
The current discussion and precedent diversity have ended with the Supreme Court Decision of the Joint Chambers dated 19.10.2018.
In the decision, it was decided that “there is no need to take a defense in the immediate termination of the employment contract due to the absence which is because of health reasons of the employee for six weeks more than notice period of the employee.”
On justification of the decision of General Assembly on the Unification of Judgments it was emphasized that;
- There is no reference to Article 19 which regulates the termination procedure including the need to receive defense and therefore, the termination cannot be deemed invalid due to the failure to receive a defense before the termination on the last paragraph of Article 25 of Law No. 4857, which the reasons for rightful termination on behalf of employer are counted;
- The purpose of receiving a defense before the termination was to identify the factors that adversely affect the business relationship and to allow the workers who had been informed about this issue to be able to correct or eliminate the negativity of the of his/her performance apart from being a formal factor; however, it was also emphasized that there was no meaning to demand the defense from the employee when the employee was not related to issue or if the employee could not change it;
- The health reasons causing the termination of the employment contract due to the employee’s absenteeism exceeding the notice period could not be evaluated within the scope of the employee's behavior or efficiency which are involved in the second paragraph of Article 19; and therefore there is no need to receive employee’s statement;
- The defense to be received from the employee before the termination was not intended to reach any result due to the employee’s absenteeism exceeding his/her notice period, since the reports received are the only documents proving the result of termination, it is not possible to obtain a document or a situation that can be learned by receiving defence.
Indeed, it is known that the uncertainty before the decision of joint chambers is hesitant because it is not possible to obtain the defense from the employees who have health report and who are not in the workplace, since it is not effective to the result in the possibility of obtaining defense, it is known that that it has to be included in the process only as a procedural process.
As a result, it is important to emphasize that according to the decision given by the General Assembly on the Unification of Judgments the employee does not need to be received a defence before the termination of the employment contract by the employer because of the reasons arising from the absence of the employee for six weeks more than his/her notice period due to the health reasons.
You may reach the complete text of the Decision by clicking the link: Yargıtay İçtihadı Birleştirme Hukuk Genel Kurulu 19.10.2018 tarih, 2017/9E., 2018/10K. Sayılı kararı
Other News
-
19.4.2024
The Constitutional Court Decision Annulled The Regulation Envisaging Liability For Litigation Expenses Within The Scope Of Mediation In Civil Disputes
In accordance with paragraph 11 of Article 18/A of Law No. 6325 on Mediation in Civil Disputes1 ("the Code"), a party shall be held liable for the entire cost of the litigation, nothwithstanding justification at the conclusion of the proceedings, and shall not be granted power of attorney fee if he or she fails to appear for the initial session of mandatory mediation without providing an explanation.The aforementioned regulation is outlined as follows:
-
8.4.2024
E-Application" Period In Capital Markets Board Applications
With its announcement dated 5 February 2024, the Capital Markets Board ("Board") announced to the public that capital market institutions, organisations and partnerships will be able to make their applications more quickly and effectively through the e-Application System.
-
5.4.2024
The Amounts In The Pre-Conditions To Be Complied With Before The Initial Public Offering Of Shares In Several Sectors Were Decreased
The Capital Markets Board ("Board" or "CMB") decreased the financial thresholds for financial statements, especially considering the sectoral differences of the companies that submitting to the Board for initial public offering and the 12th Development Plan ("Plan") prepared by the Presidency of the Strategy and Budget Directorate.
-
15.3.2024
New Regulations Introduced With The 8th Judicial Package
The Law No. 7499 on the Amendment of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Certain Laws ("Law"), which contains amendments and new regulations known as the "8th Judicial Package", was published in the Official Gazette dated 12 March 2024 and numbered 32487. In this article, we will discuss the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271 (" CPC"), Turkish Criminal Code No. 5237 ("TCC"), Turkish Civil Code No. 4721 ("TCC"), Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004 ("EBC") and Law No. 6384 on the Duties and Working Procedures and Principles of the Compensation Commission.
-
12.3.2024
Changes In The PDPL Was Published In THE Official Gazette
Law No. 7499 on Amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure and Some Laws ("Law No. 7499") including critical amendments to the Law No. 6698 on the Personal Data Protection Law ("PDPL") was published in the Official Gazette on March 12, 2024.
-
9.2.2024
Amendments Were Made To The Regulations Based On The Occupational Health And Safety Law
In the Official Gazette dated 4 February 2024 and numbered 32450, amendments were made to some regulations issued based on the Occupational Health and Safety Law No. 6331:
-
1.2.2024
Turkish Competition Board Mergers And Acquisitions Outlook Report For 2023 Has Been Published
On January 5th, 2024, the Turkish Competition Authority has published the Report prepared by the Competition Board on Mergers, Acquisitions And Privatisation Transactions in 2023 ("Report").
-
31.1.2024
Important Principle Decision From The Advertising Board Regarding Discount Sale Advertisements
At the first meeting of the year held on January 9, 2024, the Advertising Board made an important principle decision regarding discount sale advertisements by amending the "Guideline on Advertisements Containing Price Information and Discount Sale Advertisements and Commercial Practices" in order to prevent consumer victimization through misleading advertisements and practices that lead to unfair competition in the retail trade sector.
-
17.1.2024
The Authority to Decide on Trademark Cancellation Passed to the Turkish Patent And Trademark Office!
In Article 192/1 (a) of the Industrial Property Law ("IPL") published in the Official Gazette dated 10 January 2017 and numbered 29944, the enforcement of Article 26 of the Law titled "Cancellation Cases and Cancellation Request" was postponed until seven years later, and with the Provisional Article 4 of the IPL, it was stipulated that the authority to decide on the cancellation of trademarks would be directly exercised by the Intellectual and Industrial Rights Civil Courts until 10 January 2024.
-
16.1.2024
Egemenoğlu Hukuk Bürosu / Internship Application
We are pleased to announce the opening of internship applications at Egemenoğlu Hukuk Bürosu. Legal Internship Application Deadline: March 15 Summer Internship Application Deadline: March 29 Prospective candidates are requested to submit their CVs either through our website www.egemenoglu.av.tr or by sending them to info@egemenoglu.av.tr.
-
12.1.2024
Turkish Sustainability Reporting Standards (TSRS) And Scope Of Application Of TSRSs Were Puslished In The Official Gazette
In the Official Gazette dated 29.12.2023 and numbered 32414, the Public Oversight, Accounting and Auditing Standards Authority (POA) announced the Turkish Sustainability Reporting Standards and determined the principles to be followed in sustainability reports.
-
11.1.2024
Important Regulations Which Are Effective As Of 2024 And/ Or Has Been Made Subject To Time Extension
Laws No. 5746 and No. 6550 extended the regulation on higher depreciation (showing expenses related to depreciation) and calculation rates and periods for new machines acquired for use in R&D, innovation and design activities.
-
19.12.2023
The Principles and Rules to be Applied in Retail Trade have been reorganize
With the "Regulation Amending the Regulation on Principles and Rules to be Applied in Retail Trade" prepared by the Ministry of Commerce and published in the official gazette on 14.12.2023, significant changes were made in the principles and rules of retail trade.
-
18.11.2023
Warning From The Authority On Sending Verification Codes To Customers Via Sms During Shopping
The Personal Data Protection Authority ("Authority") published a Public Announcement ("Announcement") on the Processing of Personal Data by Sending a Verification Code via SMS to the Data Subjects during Shopping in Stores.
-
14.11.2023
Communiqué Amending the Communiqué on the Procedures and Principles Regarding the Application of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 has been published
In order to regulate the procedures and principles to be followed in cases of loss of capital or insolvency of joint stock companies, limited liability companies and limited partnership companies with capital divided into shares within the scope of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (Law), the Communiqué on the Procedures and Principles Regarding the Application of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (Communiqué) was first published in the Official Gazette dated 15/09/2018 and numbered 30536, and with the Provisional Article 1 of this Communiqué until 01/01/2023, Within the scope of Article 376 of the Law, it was stated that foreign exchange losses arising from foreign currency denominated liabilities that have not yet been fulfilled may not be taken into account in the calculations regarding capital loss or insolvency.