THE LIMITS OF UNFAIR COMPETITION BY DENIGRATING UNDER THE LIGHT OF THE JUDGEMENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF CIVIL CHAMBERS OF SUPREME COURT 09 January 2021

Unfair competition refers to all behaviors and practices that violate the integrity rule of the parties of the economic order and distort competition against one party. For the existence of unfair competition, it is not obligatory for the parties to be competitors, or the perpetrator to benefit from unfair competition or the perpetrator has been at fault. What is essential for the existence of unfair competition; is the use of the economic competition right contrary to the good faith. |
Rules of unfair competition are regulated under Article 54 to 63 of Turkish Commercial Code No 6102. The Article 54 of Turkish Commercial Code titled “purpose and principle” sets out the general principle of unfair competition. According to this: “behaviors or practices that are of deceptive nature or in violation with the principle of good faith between commercial rivals or suppliers and customers are qualified unjust and illegal”. In the continuation of this general principle, some unfair competition actions that are frequently encountered in practice and that are against the good faith are listed. |
It is unfair competition “to denigrate others or their goods, business products, prices, activities or business affairs with false, misleading or unnecessarily offensive statements” according to Article 55/1-a of Turkish Commercial Code No 6102. The term "denigration" here, in general terms, refers to behaviors that will create a negative impression of a person's commercial life. As it can be understood from the text of the article, in order for unfair competition to occur within the scope of such article, it is necessary to disparage the activities of others with unnecessarily offensive statements. According to the justification of the Article, denigration includes defamation, obscuring, belittling and dropping its value according to the concrete event. Therefore defamation, obscuring or belittling others or their goods, business products, prices, activities or business affairs is considered within the scope of "denigration". In order for the declaration of denigration to constitute unfair competition; this declaration should be made with false, misleading or unnecessarily offensive explanations. First of all, the main issue sought is that the statement to be "delusive". In other words, if the statements are true, it shall not be taken into consideration within the scope of unfair competition. The current case law of the Supreme Court has been reached a consensus in such a way that there is no room for hesitation to unfair competition be mentioned if the statement is true. |
As it stated at The Judgement of General Assembly of Civil Chambers of Supreme Court dated 10/06/2020, numbered 2017/39 E. and 2020/396 K.: in order for the "denigration" in the article to be qualified as "unfair competition", first there must be a statement, it must be about personality, property, work products, activities or commercial affairs of others; and finally, this statement must be false, misleading or unnecessarily offensive. False statement is a statement that content is incompatible with the truth, and that content is objectively incorrect about a particular fact or event or situation. Misleading statements are statements that, when evaluated together with their nature, style and content, may cause the addressee of the statement to fall into error and make a false impression on them. And an unnecessarily hurtful statement which exceeds its purpose by creating a negative impression about a person, his/her activities, work products etc. and create a negative impression about while being accurate in its content. (Suluk, Cahit / Karasu, Rauf / Nal, Temel: Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku, Ankara, 2017, s.428) |
The only criterion for determining whether the statement is "false" is whether it is compatible with reality. If the statement is accurate, then unfair competition cannot be mentioned. On the other hand, the criterion to be used for determining whether the statement is "misleading" or "unnecessarily hurtful" is the usual medium-skilled addressee of the statement. |
In other words, whichever group the statement is made to, the mode of understanding of a person of medium ability belonging to that group will be taken as basis. Therefore, the way that the explanation is perceived by the average addressee is important not how the statement is perceived by a particular person or persons. (Ülgen, Hüseyin / Helvacı, Mehmet / Kendigelen, Abuzer / Kaya, Aslan / Nomer Ertan, Füsun: Ticari İşletme Hukuku, İstanbul, 2015, s. 540) |
In the dispute subject to the decision of the General Assembly of Civil Chambers of Supreme Court dated 10/06/2020, numbered 2017/39 E. and 2020/396 K.; the plaintiff has claimed that the plaintiff has purchased a port crane from the defendant company and spare parts service from the other defendant to this crane, and that although any service has not been requested from the defendant it has been notified to plaintiff that the cylinder of the crane is ultrasound checked and needs to be replaced immediately and that the crane’s guarantee term has expired, and upon this the plaintiff got a report by a private company that there were no cracks on the cylinder, despite this the defendants has reported that the cylinder is cracked to the Port Authority, and that it is unfair competition that the defendants to report the crane is cracked to the Port Authority although there is not such a malfunction; and demanded the defendants’ actions to be determined as unfair competition, and to be prohibited, the district court has partially accepted the case on the grounds that the action damaged the commercial reputation of the plaintiff and caused unfair competition, the parties appealed the decision, all appeals of the parties has been rejected and the decision has been approved. |
The defendant's attorney has requested a correction of the decision. The 11th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court stated that in the expert report taken by the district court during the trial that it has been clearly determined that there has a crack in the hydraulic cylinder as a result of the measurements made by two separate ultrasound devices. Thereupon, it has been decided by the high court that it is not possible that the defendants' warnings of security to the company which the plaintiff is doing business to be considered as disparaging their commodity, work product, activity or commercial affairs with false, misleading or unnecessary statements. For this reason, contrary to the acceptance of the district court, the high court overturned the decision of the district court by finding it wrong that the decision of the acceptance of the case with a wrong evaluation in writing, while it has been necessary to dismiss the case, although there was no false, misleading or offensive statement about the plaintiff in terms of the content of the letter written by the defendant party to the port operator. |
The district court resisted in its decision for previous reasons, and the dispute has been transferred to the Supreme Court Legal General Assembly. |
The General Assembly of the Supreme Court, decided that the notification subject to the case did not constitute unfair competition on the grounds that "because of the fact that it is detected by the experts that there is a crack on the cylinder of the crane; giving a security warning to the Port Authority by the defendants cannot be determined as denigrating personality or goods, business products, activities or business affairs of the plaintiff with false, misleading or unnecessarily offensive statements, since it is established that the statements of the defendants are not false, it is understood that this statement is not misleading or unnecessarily offensive. |
As can be clearly seen in the aforementioned decision, the accuracy of the statement subject to unfair competition has been taken as basis; it was emphasized that the notification made regarding the problem occurring during the execution of the contractual relationship between the parties cannot be described as defamation of the plaintiff's personality, commodity, work product, activity or commercial affairs with false, misleading or unnecessary statements. Therefore, reporting a defect, error or dysfunction related to a good or service to the relevant third parties with correct content cannot be considered within the scope of unfair competition. |
Other News
-
16.6.2025
The Court Of Cassation Abandoned Its Long-Standing Precedent Regarding Construction Conracts In Return For Land Shares, Known As "Advance Deed"
Construction contracts in return for land shares are a common practice in the construction sector in Turkey.
-
11.6.2025
Amendments To The Regulation On Distance Contracts: Return Shipping Fees And Right Of Withdrawal For Electronics
With the Regulation Amending the Regulation on Distance Contracts ("Amending Regulation") published in the Official Gazette dated May 24, 2025 and numbered 32909, important amendments were made regarding distance sales. The key changes introduced by the Amending Regulation are as follows:
-
30.5.2025
Alimony Against Inflation: Adjustmen of Alimony and the Issue of Payment in Foreign Currency
Alimony for supplementary welfare allowance and child support awarded by court judgment as a result of divorce cases is generally fixed at a certain amount and either remains the same over the years or is increased only within limited rates determined by the court. Similarly, the provisional alimony determined during the litigation process can become insufficient over time due to the prolonged duration of the proceedings and high inflation; this significantly hampers the effectiveness of alimony enforcement.
-
23.5.2025
Right To Compassionate Leave: Duration, Implementation And Assessment
Legal Basis and Definition of Compassionate Leave: In situations where an employee is unable to perform their work obligation due to certain personal circumstances in which, pursuant to the principle of good faith, the employer cannot reasonably expect the employee to work, the employee must be deemed to be on justified leave. Compassionate leave was introduced by Law No. 6645 in 2015 and is regulated under Additional Article 2 of the Turkish Labour Law No. 4857.
-
20.5.2025
The Right to Be Forgotten in the Context of Search Engines
IWith the rapid advancement of technology, personal data is increasingly recorded in digital environments and can be stored for long periods of time. This situation causes individuals' past negative experiences or changing opinions over time to remain constantly accessible. In particular, search engines make personal data widely accessible by indexing results that appear when searching individuals by their first and last names. Within this context, the "Right to Be Forgotten" stands out as the right of individuals to request the deletion of their personal data or the restriction of access to it in digital environments.
-
16.5.2025
The Penalty Clause in Turkish Law, Reduction of the Penalty Clause, and Practial Interpretations
One of the fundamental concepts of contract law, "penalty clauses" function as an important security for the creditor in the event that the debtor fails to properly perform their obligation. As an extension of the principle of freedom of contract, the parties may agree in advance to the payment of a specific amount in case the obligation is not performed at all or not performed correctly, thereby encouraging performance and easing the burden of proof for any damages that may arise.
-
13.5.2025
A Review on US Customs Tariffs and Its Impact on M&A Transactions
US President Donald Trump recently announced a "declaration of economic independence". Accordingly, a reciprocal tariff on all countries came into force. The tariff rate for Turkey was set at 10%, i.e. the minimum rate.
-
12.2.2025
An EMRA Decision: Capital Increase Obligation for Electricity Market Companies in Share Transfers to Foreign Investors
1. Current Regulation The Energy Market Regulatory Authority ("EMRA" or the "Authority") regulates the transfer of shares in the capital of companies operating in the electricity market under Article 57 of the Electricity Market Licence Regulation ("Regulation").
-
29.1.2025
Turkish Competition Board Mergers And Acquisitions Outlook Report For 2024 Has Been Published
On January 7th, 2025, the Turkish Competition Authority has published the Report prepared by the Competition Board on Mergers, Acquisitions And Privatisation Transactions in 2024 ("Report").
-
22.11.2024
The Procedure of Sale by Auction and The Legal Aspect of New Regulations Brought by the 9th Judicial Package
By new regulations brought by the 9th Judicial Package, a new legal frame for the sale of seized goods electronically is instructed according to Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law Article 111/b. Transactions about the sales of seized goods are made via a sale portal integrated with the National Judicial Network Information System (UYAP) by auction. However, because of the legal gaps of the law, an application about the sale transactions cannot be displayed. The amendments introduced by legislators to the law regarding electronic sales in the 8th and 9th Judicial Packages, as well as the newly established regulations, are considered an important step toward making foreclosure processes faster and ensuring that sales transactions are conducted in a safer and more transparent environment.
-
15.11.2024
Law Numbered 7531 On Amendments To Certain Laws Was Published
Law1 No. 7531 on the Amendment of Certain Laws ("Law"), also known as the 9th Judicial Package, was published in the Official Gazette dated 14.11.2024 and numbered 32722 and contains significant amendments to 17 different laws.
-
13.11.2024
E-Government Era Begins In Lease Agreements!
The Ministry of Treasury and Finance ("Ministry") announced in the 2023-2025 period of its 2022 Action Plan for Combating the Informal Economy ("Action Plan") that lease agreements could be concluded through the e-Government portal to support the decision-making processes of the parties involved and conduct risk analysis studies. The first phase of this activity was launched on November 4, 2024, through the e-Government portal, and the second phase is expected to be implemented by the end of the year.
-
11.11.2024
A New Era in Digital Markets: The Competition Authori's The Competition Authority's 2024-2028 Strategic Plan Published
The Competition Authority ("the Authority") has published its 2024-2028 Strategic Plan ("the Strategic Plan") with the aim of adapting to the rapidly evolving dynamics of digital markets and maintaining a competitive economic order. Developed in light of recent shifts in the global competitive environment, the Strategic Plan focuses on new regulations in digital markets and emerging technologies. The Authority aims to ensure fair and competitive markets through this plan, with a clear focus on enhancing consumer welfare.
-
31.10.2024
Public Announcement on Standard Contract Notification Module Published
Public Announcement on Standard Contract Notification Module published on 24.10.2024 on the official website of Personal Data Protection Authority ("Authority"). By the decision dated 17.10.2024, the Personal Data Protection Board ("Board") created "Standard Contract Notification Module" ("Module") in order to carry out standard contract notification processes in a faster and more efficient manner and decided that the notifications could also be carried out online via the Module.
-
28.10.2024
Warning To Research Companies: Inform First, Then Obtain Consent
After the number of complaints to the Personal Data Protection Authority ("Authority"), the Authority published a Public Announcement on "Personal Data Processing Activities of Research Companies by Using "Random-Digit Dialing as a Method of Telephone Sampling" for the purpose of Statistical Research" ("Public Announcement").