WHAT DOES THE NEW HMK SAY ABOUT "AMENDMENT OF PLEADING AFTER THE REVERSAL"? 23 October 2020
A groundbreaking change has taken place that will put an end to the controversies that have been going on for decades regarding the "Amendment of Pleading After Reversal Decision" regulation of the HMK. In this newsletter, we are going to examine what the new regulation brings.
|
There are many important amendments on the Code of Civil Procedure numbered 6100 with the Law No.7251 which published on Official Gazette dated 28.07.2020 and numbered 31199. |
|
All of these amendments which have been introduced contain regulations that are very important in terms of procedural law. One of them is the amendment in Article 177, which states that “amendment of pleading” shall be made in disputes that return to the court of first instance after the decision of reversal or removal. The additional paragraph brought to the article has a feature to put an end to the ongoing discussions on the subject and to clarify the amendment of pleading after the reversal issue. |
|
In this newsletter of ours, we are going to focus on this important amendment regarding the amendment of pleading. |
|
What is amendment of pleading? |
|
There are two exceptions to the prohibition of extension or change of claims and defense, which is imposed in order to continue the trial process in a healthy way by limiting the submission of the claims and defenses of the parties and the facts that are the basis of them with a period of time, to a certain trial phase. One of these exceptions is the acceptance of the other party while the other is amendment of pleading. |
|
Amendment of pleading is the process of changing the procedural transactions performed by one of the parties during the trial partially or completely. Amendment of pleading is an opportunity to change the case, in other words to eliminate the prohibition of extension or change of claims and defense, and it has a highly important function in the trial for the parties. |
|
Since the amendment of pleading is a unilateral and clear declaration of intention brought to the court, it does not depend on the acceptance of the other party or the court if the legal requirements are met. For instance, the parties can increase the value of the lawsuit or change their request completely, regardless of the acceptance of the counterparty. |
|
Until when the parties can amend the pleading? What is changed with the new regulation brought about the timing regarding the amendment of pleading? |
|
Paragraph 1 of Article 177 of the Code of Civil Procedure ("HMK") No. 6100, which repealed the Code of Civil Procedure No. 1086 ("HUMK") with its entry into force, regulates that the amendment of pleading shall be made until the end of the investigation. |
|
However, this regulation is in the same direction as the provisions of the HUMK regarding the amendment of pleading and it has not clarified the “is it possible to amend the pleading after the decision of reversal?” issue which has been controversial before the date of entry into force of HMK numbered 6100 and considered to have been remedied by the Decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly on the Unification of Judgements numbered 1944/10 M. 1948/3 D and dated 04.02.1948. |
|
For this reason, controversy and disagreements about the Decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly on the Unification of Judgements, dated 04.02.1948, which prohibits the amendment of pleading after the decision of reversal, have not ended after 01.10.2011, the date which the HMK numbered 6100 entered into force. As a result of differences in interpretation between the decisions of the Civil Chambers of the Court of Cassation, the General Assembly on the Unification of Judgements is requested that these contradictions between the departments be eliminated by unification of the decisions. The decision numbered 2015/1 M. and 2016/1 D. and dated 06.05.2016, issued by the General Assembly on the Unification of Judgements upon the aforementioned request, has been concluded by the majority of votes that "after the reversal decision, no amendment of pleading can be made and the Decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly on the Unification of Judgements dated 04.02.1948 does not need to be amended" while the many legal interpretations made about why the Decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly on the Unification of Judgements dated 04.02.1948 should be changed in the dissenting opinions. |
|
The dissenting opinions in general it has been advocated to change the Decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly on the Unification of Judgements according to the reasons that it is a necessity to achieve a clear application in line with the principles of freedom to seek rights and facilitating the acquisition of a right, the decision dated 04.02.1948violates the right to legal remedies and access to court, that the legislator have not made a regulation which indicates that the amendment of pleading is not possible after the reversal decision in both the former law and the law numbered 6100 while it can, that a reversal decision resulting from the procedural law, which has given before consideration of merits, abolishes the right of correction granted to the parties before it was born and according to the provisions of the law numbered 6100 it is regulated that the investigation is going to start after the reversal in the procedural decisions without entering the merits and that the investigation is going to start again with complying with the reversal of the decisions on the merits. |
|
As it is seen, the issue of whether it is possible to amend the pleading after reversal has been a subject of dispute in our law for many years, and there was no consensus on the issue before the amendments introduced by Law No. 7251. |
|
The additional paragraph brought to Article 177 of the HMK by Law No. 7251, which was published in the Official Gazette dated 28.07.2020 and numbered 31199, is an arrangement that will break a new ground and put an end to all this uncertainty that has been going on for decades. |
|
According to the amendment that has been brought to Article 177/2 of HMK by the law numbered 7251; "When the file is sent to the court of first instance after the reversal decision of the Supreme Court or the abolition decision of the regional court of appeal if the court of first instance takes an action regarding the investigation, the amendment of pleading can be made until the end of the investigation. However, the legal situation that arose by complying with the decision of reversal cannot be eliminated. " |
|
Thus, the legislator has clearly determined that if an action is taken regarding the investigation when the file is returned to the court of first instance after the reversal and removal decisions, the correction can be made until the investigation is completed. |
|
For this reason, the additional second paragraph regulation on "the amendment of pleading after reversal" brought to Article 177/2 of the HMK takes an important place among the new HMK amendments and aims to completely eliminate the uncertainty in implementation. |
Other News
-
4.12.2025
Loans To Shareholders And Adat Invoice
In practice, it is quite common for companies to extend loans to their shareholders. In situations where the company becomes a creditor of its shareholders, adat interest must be calculated on the outstanding balance and an invoice must be issued. Accordingly, adat is a method used to calculate accrued interest based on the period during which company funds are utilized by shareholders or related parties, ensuring that any potential tax loss is compensated. These calculations are important for compliance with transfer pricing rules, accurate determination of the tax base, and the fulfillment of legal obligations such as Value Added Tax (“VAT”).
-
28.11.2025
Notification Process To The Central Securities Depository & Trade Repository Of Türkiye For Bearer Share Certificates And Legal Consequences
1. Issuance and Notification of Bearer Share Certificates Pursuant to Article 484 of the Turkish Commercial Code ("TCC"), joint stock companies have two types of share certificates: registered shares and bearer shares. While the transfer of registered shares is completed through delivery, certain conditions have been introduced under the Communiqué on the Notification and Registration of Bearer Share Certificates with the Central Securities Depository ("Communiqué") for the transfer of bearer shares. Within the scope of the Communiqué, the registration of bearer shares with the Central Securities Depository & Trade Reposıtory of Türkiye ("MKK"), the adoption of a board resolution, and the registration and announcement of this resolution before the relevant trade registry directorate and in the Turkish Trade Registry Gazette are required.
-
20.11.2025
The Letter Of Intent Procsess in Merger and Acquisition Transactions
Merger and acquisition ("M&A") transactions are multi-layered processes from both legal and commercial perspectives. Before the parties proceed to the contractual stage, they enter into a preparatory phase in order to articulate their transactional intentions, exchange commercial expectations, and establish the legal framework. This preparatory phase constitutes the initial stage in which the parties discuss the fundamental principles of the transaction structure, formulate their negotiation strategies, and assess the transactional risks.
-
14.11.2025
New Constitutional Court Decision On Violation Of The Right To A Reasoned Decision Published İn The Official Gazette
1. INTRODUCTION The reasoning constitutes the part of judicial decisions that demonstrates the cause and justification for resolving the matter in the manner indicated in the operative section, and it is an extension of adjudication. The fact that the reasoning is satisfactory and consistent is crucial for ensuring the right to be legally heard and the right to a fair trial. By setting forth the court's impartiality, a reasoned judgment enables the parties to understand and be satisfied with the material and legal grounds upon which they have won or lost the case, owing to reasoning that genuinely aligns with the contents of the file, as well as with logic and law.
-
7.11.2025
Decision Of The Constitutional Court Concercing Excluded Pernonnel
In the Constitutional Court's Judgment published in the Official Gazette dated 22 September 2025.
-
24.10.2025
The Obligation for the Principal and Subcontractor Employers to Jointly Participate in Mediation Has Been Annuled by the Constitutional Court
An important Constitutional Court decision has been published regarding the mediation process that an employee can apply to with a request for reinstatement after the termination of employment relations in the workplace. The Constitutional Court ruled that the provision in paragraph (15) of Article 3 of the Labor Courts Law No. 7036, which states, "In cases where there is a principal employer-subcontractor relationship, for a request for reinstatement to be submitted to a mediator, the employers must participate in the mediation talks together and their intentions must be compatible for an agreement to be reached," is unconstitutional. The decision was published in the Official Gazette dated October 17, 2025, and numbered 33050.
-
23.10.2025
The Constitutional Court Has Annulled The Provision Granting The President Authority To Restrict Foreign Exhange And Money Movements!
In its decision No. 2024/193 Merits 2025/136 Decision1 dated 17 June 2025 ("Decision"), published in the Official Gazette on 15 October 2025, the Constitutional Court ("Court") annulled Article 1 of Law No. 1567 on the Protection of the Value of the Turkish Currency ("Law"). The annulled provision had stated that: "The President is authorized to make decisions for the regulation and restriction of the export from or import into the country of currencies, securities, and bonds, and of the purchase and sale of foreign exchange, cash, securities, bonds, precious metals, precious stones, and any goods and valuables made of or containing them; as well as of commercial papers and all means and instruments used for payment, and to take decisions aimed at protecting the value of the Turkish currency."
-
21.10.2025
Seizure of Property Belonging to Persons Other than the Debtor and Protection of Legal Rights
In enforcement proceedings, the seizure of property that does not belong to the debtor but rather to third parties is a situation frequently encountered in practice that leads to significant aggrievements. Uncertainties arising from property regimes complicate ownership relations, making it difficult to accurately determine to whom the property belongs during enforcement measures. Within this framework, when seizure is imposed on property belonging to the debtor's spouse or another third party, the most important legal remedy is the ownership claim (assertion).
-
20.10.2025
Mergers and Acquisitions and the Notification Obligation within the Framework of Competition Law
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are at the center of the growth and restructuring strategies of companies. These transactions, serving the purpose of companies to expand both nationally and internationally to increase their market shares or to enter into new markets, not only give rise to economic and commercial consequences but also carry the potential to directly affect the competition dynamics in the relevant market. Therefore, merger and acquisition transactions may affect the competition structure in the market. In this respect, while M&A transactions create strategic opportunities, they are also among the areas carefully scrutinized by regulatory authorities to preserve competitive order.
-
17.10.2025
Important Amendment to the Organized Industrial Zones (OIZ) Implementation Regulation: Additional Time Granted To Participant
Published in the Official Gazette No. 33050, dated October 17, 2025, the "Regulation Amending the Organized Industrial Zones Implementation Regulation" introduces a new Provisional Article 13 to the existing regulation.This new provision allows OIZ participants who have not yet obtained a building permit or a workplace opening and operating license to apply for an extension period under certain conditions.
-
15.10.2025
Current Status Of The Obligation To Maintain Commercial Books In Electronic Form
1. INTRODUCTION With the Communiqué Amending the Communiqué on Keeping Commercial Books Not Related to the Accounting of the Enterprise in Electronic Form, published in the Official Gazette dated September 20, 2025 and numbered 33023 (“Amendment Communiqué”), significant amendments have been introduced to the Communiqué on Keeping Commercial Books Not Related to the Accounting of the Enterprise in Electronic Form, published in the Official Gazette dated February 14, 2025 and numbered 32813 (“Communiqué”).
-
25.9.2025
Social Security Procedures To Be Carried Out By The Employer Following A Reinstateme
Upon receiving notification of a final and binding reinstatement decision, if the employee communicates their intention to return to work within 10 business days, the employer may either reinstate the employee or refuse reinstatement by paying both the four months' idle period wages determined by the court and the compensation for non-reinstatement. As seen, the employer has two alternative courses of action in this situation; however, the procedures to be carried out before the Social Security Institution (SGK) differ in each case.
-
19.9.2025
The Court of Cassation has Ruled That The Competent Court Fot Cases Brought On The Grounds Of Volation Of The Non-Competition Clause Is The Commercial Court of First Instance
1. Introduction The duty not to compete is a type of loyalty obligation owed by the employee to the employer. The employee undertakes not to compete with the employer during the term of the employment contract as part of their loyalty obligation. However, Turkish law does not contain any legal provisions prohibiting the employee from competing with the employer after the employment contract has ended. However, the parties may freely agree that the employee will not compete with the employer after the termination of the employment contract. Articles 444-447 of the Turkish Code of Obligations also contain provisions and restrictions regarding non-competition agreements that may be established between the employee and the employer.
-
16.9.2025
Transfer Fee: Legal Characterization and Practical Application
1. Introduction The concept of a transfer fee is not directly defined in the Turkish Labor Code; its framework and legal nature in practice have largely been shaped by the decisions of the Court of Cassation (Turkey). This practice, which arises particularly in sectors with intense competition and limited skilled labor, is a type of payment that employers must carefully consider within the scope of their employment policies.
-
5.9.2025
Competition in the Labor Market: HR Practices to Avoid
The Turkish Competition Authority ("Authority"), which is entrusted with ensuring the proper functioning of markets, identifying practices that restrict competition, and imposing sanctions against infringements, operates under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition ("Law") without distinction between input and output markets. Labor markets have recently emerged as one of the primary arenas in which entities compete in input markets and, with the influence of various additional dynamics, have become a market increasingly prioritized by the Authority. The Guidelines on Competition Violations in Labor Markets ("Guidelines"), adopted by the Authority on November 21, 2024, serve as an important reference for the prevention of competition infringements in labor markets. In this bulletin, in light of the Guidelines and decisions of the Competition Board ("Board") within the Authority, (i) the fundamental principles and information regarding the application of competition law to labor markets, and (ii) the main prohibited practices to be observed when competing in labor markets will be addressed.
